You lost your job. Or you were passed over. Or the harassment finally got bad enough that you had to walk away. And now someone's telling you that before you can set foot in a courtroom, the first step is filing something with a government agency. That's right — and the deadline to do it is shorter than most people expect.
For employment discrimination claims under federal law — including Title VII (race, sex, national origin, color, religion), the ADA (disability), and the ADEA (age) — filing a charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is a required first step. It is not optional, and the deadline is not flexible. This article explains the Indiana-specific timeline, how the EEOC process works, what happens when the EEOC issues a right-to-sue letter, and how this intersects with the Indiana employment law landscape.
Why Indiana Has a 300-Day Deadline, Not 180
Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, there are two possible charge-filing deadlines: 180 days or 300 days. Which deadline applies depends on whether the state where the discrimination occurred has a state agency with authority to handle employment discrimination complaints.
Indiana has such an agency: the Indiana Civil Rights Commission (ICRC). Because Indiana is a "deferral state," charges of discrimination under Title VII, ADA, and ADEA are subject to the 300-day deadline — 300 calendar days from the date of the discriminatory act. The same 300-day rule applies to ADA and ADEA charges under the work-sharing arrangement between the EEOC and the ICRC.
This does not mean the deadline is relaxed. 300 days passes faster than people expect when the aftermath of a termination or hostile work environment involves job searching, emotional recovery, and financial stress. And the clock generally starts running from each discrete discriminatory act, not from the day the pattern becomes clear or the day you decide you have had enough.
The EEOC and ICRC Work-Sharing Agreement
The EEOC and ICRC have a work-sharing agreement that simplifies the administrative process: filing a charge with one agency automatically cross-files it with the other. As a practical matter, most people in Indiana file with the EEOC (through EEOC.gov, by calling the EEOC, or in person at an EEOC office), and the cross-filing with the ICRC happens automatically.
This means you generally do not need to file two separate complaints — one federal charge effectively preserves your rights under both federal law (EEOC) and Indiana state law (ICRC/ICRA). The specifics of which agency handles which aspects of the investigation can vary, but from the perspective of preserving your legal rights, one filing does the job in most cases.
What the Charge Filing Actually Does
Filing a charge is not a lawsuit. It is the administrative complaint that begins the EEOC process. It preserves your right to later file a lawsuit — but it does not guarantee one, and the EEOC process itself does not end in a court judgment.
After a charge is filed, the EEOC:
- Notifies the employer that a charge has been filed
- May offer mediation or early conciliation to both parties
- Investigates the charge — requesting documents and position statements from the employer, sometimes interviewing witnesses
- Makes a determination: whether "reasonable cause" exists to believe discrimination occurred, or a "no cause" finding
In most cases, the investigation ends without a finding of cause and without litigation. The EEOC issues a right-to-sue letter, which authorizes the charging party to file a lawsuit regardless of the investigation's outcome.
The Right-to-Sue Letter and the 90-Day Window
The right-to-sue letter (formally, the Notice of Right to Sue) is the document that opens the door to federal court. Under Title VII, the ADA, and the ADEA, you have 90 days from the date you receive the right-to-sue letter to file your lawsuit in federal district court. This is a jurisdictional deadline. Courts regularly dismiss cases filed even one day after the 90-day window closes.
Two practical points about the 90-day clock:
- You can request a right-to-sue letter before the investigation concludes. For Title VII and ADA charges, the EEOC will issue one on request after 180 days. This allows charging parties to get into court without waiting for the investigation to finish.
- The clock starts from receipt, not from the date on the letter. If the letter was mailed and sat uncollected, courts may presume receipt within a certain number of days from mailing. Knowing when the letter arrives — and responding quickly — is important.
What the EEOC Does and Does Not Do
The EEOC investigates charges and pursues systemic or significant cases on its own in a small percentage of matters. In the overwhelming majority of cases, the EEOC's process ends with a determination and a right-to-sue letter. The EEOC does not represent individual charging parties in their own lawsuits. If you want to pursue a federal discrimination case after receiving the right-to-sue letter, you will need your own attorney.
The ICRC similarly investigates state-law claims. A finding of cause by either agency can be useful, but it is not a court judgment and does not bind a court in subsequent litigation.
Retaliation
Filing an EEOC charge is a protected activity. Retaliation — adverse employment action taken because an employee engaged in protected activity — is itself an unlawful employment practice under Title VII and related statutes. "Adverse action" in the retaliation context is interpreted broadly: it includes not only termination and demotion but also actions that would dissuade a reasonable person from making or supporting a charge.
If your employer takes adverse action against you after you file a charge, that is potentially a separate and independent claim. The deadline for the retaliation charge runs from the date of the retaliatory act, not from the date of the original charge. Because retaliation can happen quickly after a charge is filed, documenting what happens in the workplace after filing matters.
Claims That Do Not Go Through the EEOC
Not every workplace claim requires an EEOC charge. Some important examples:
- FMLA (Family and Medical Leave Act): FMLA interference and retaliation claims are not within EEOC jurisdiction. They are enforced through the U.S. Department of Labor and private litigation under 29 U.S.C. § 2617, with a two-year statute of limitations (three years for willful violations).
- Wage and hour claims: Claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) or Indiana's Wage Payment Statute (Ind. Code § 22-2-5) and Wage Claims Statute (Ind. Code § 22-2-9) follow separate enforcement mechanisms. FLSA claims have a two-year statute of limitations (three years for willful violations). Indiana wage claims have their own filing requirements. See our article on unpaid wages and wage-and-hour claims in Indiana for more.
- Section 1981 claims: Race discrimination claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 do not require EEOC exhaustion and can be filed directly in federal court within the applicable limitations period.
For wrongful termination and workplace retaliation claims, see our article on Indiana wrongful termination and workplace retaliation. The Hammond Legal employment law page covers the full range of workplace matters the firm handles. For questions about a specific workplace situation, contact the firm — the deadline analysis varies depending on the claim, and determining which deadlines apply is often the first substantive question.
Serving Indiana Employers and Employees
Employment disputes arise across Central Indiana, from manufacturing employers in Madison County to tech employers and large businesses in Marion County (Indianapolis) and Hamilton County (Noblesville). Hammond Legal handles employment matters throughout the seven-county service area: Madison, Hamilton, Hancock, Marion, Shelby, Delaware, and Henry counties.
Common Questions
Questions About an Employment Claim?
The 300-day EEOC deadline and 90-day lawsuit window are strict. Attorney Emilee Hammond handles employment discrimination, retaliation, and workplace matters throughout Central Indiana.